Moving Pictures: The Atwater Library + ACT + Nuit Blanche on Sat. Feb 27th

We know libraries are packed full of fascinating stories but these stories are usually found in books that sit silently on shelves. This weekend will be a little different because the walls and windows of the Atwater Library are about to come alive with video footage from local Montreal residents.

In preparation for Nuit Blanche (part of Montréal en lumière festival), the Atwater Library’s Digital Literacy Project has worked together with older Montreal residents to digitize Super 8, 16 mm, and 8 mm home movie reels. Not only have the older adults involved contributed to the digitization and editing process of their home movies, they’ve created soundtracks to accompany the projections.

From 5:00 pm – 1:00 am on Saturday, February 27th, viewers will be immersed in movies from the 1940s through to the 1970s as the stories and sounds of Montreal residents dance on the walls and windows of the Atwater Library’s 188-year-old heritage building.

Join us at Moving Pictures: Moving Histories Out of the Attic and Into the Public as we share stories from times and technologies of the past at the Atwater Library (1200 Atwater Avenue; metro: Atwater).

The Atwater Library is a partner of Concordia’s ACT (Ageing + Communication + Technologies) Project and this project is specifically connected to the Older Adults Music Making Club. The project has gained additional support from New Horizons for Seniors.

If you’re interested in checking out a similar, older project, have a look at Memoryspace. This was a project that we worked on with the Atwater Library in 2012.

1200 Atwater Ave 

Metro: Atwater

Perpetuating exclusion in Wikipedia

Wikipedia has become an indispensable source of online information for students and researchers because of its ease of use as well as its reputation as a user-generated encyclopaedia of shared knowledge. But is it? Our research suggests a much more complicated and twisted tale. Wikipedia is a space of negotiation, contestation and struggles over inclusion and exclusion into “encyclopedic” knowledge.

Groupe Harmonie joins ACT as Community Partner

We are delighted to announce the inclusion of Groupe Harmonie as an official partner in the ACT project. Groupe Harmonie is a non-profit organization that works with elders with addiction issues in Montreal. ACT has been working with Groupe Harmonie since 2014 and together we have been organizing digital literacy workshops in local low-income housing buildings for seniors as part of the InterACTion project.

 

 

Gender, “notability” and perpetuating exclusion in Wikipedia: The case of WAM or the Centre for Women, Ageing and Medi

By Maude Gauthier and Kim Sawchuk

 

 

Wikipedia has become an indispensable source of online information for students and researchers because of its ease of use as well as its reputation as a user-generated encyclopaedia of shared knowledge. Is it?

The representation of women in Wikipedia reveals how Wikipedia remains a space of contestation and struggle. Studies show that less than 15% of contributors to Wikipedia are women (UNU-MERIT Wikipedia Survey 2010; Collier & Bear 2012; Antin, Yee, Cheshire, Nov 2011) and that women are not equally represented on Wikipedia (Reagle & Rhue 2011). Edit-o-thons, known as wiki-storms, have been organized to counteract the low visibility of women on Wikipedia (e.g. Art + Feminism). The ACTipedia project is both a research project that is teaching us about the inner logics and workings of Wikipedia and an activist project to rectify representations of ageing on Wikipedia. At first, our desire was to redress the absence of writing on ageing from an ageing studies perspective in French. Our mission has expanded since then. Since beginning the ACTipedia project, we have created and modified more than a dozen entries in French and English.

One of our most interesting experiences with Wikipedia has been with our attempt to create an entry for Women, Ageing and Media. What our struggle to resist the deletion of the entry indicates is how the notability criteria can be used to eliminate constituencies who are already marginalized- or do not seek media attention- from Wikipedia.

If you would like to know more, please link to WAM’s entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre_for_Women,_Ageing_and_Media.

In a nutshell: this entry was nominated for deletion almost instantly. It was deleted, re-established, and then re-nominated for deletion. The Wikipedian nominating its deletion admits to a keen interest in MRM, the Men’s Rights Movements, however in justifying his deletions he relies on Wikipedia’s criteria of notability, the idea of neutrality and Wikipedia’s referencing system to justify his position.

Our experience shows how Wikipedia’s criteria are not neutral. Of utmost importance for our case: articles have to be based on third party, non-affiliated sources, which are seen as a guarantee of neutrality. Living persons and research centres must have exposure in mainstream media or have an entire book written about them. Moreover, there are other more specific criteria deemed ineligible such as quotes from the members of WAM, which do not count as they are considered ‘primary sources’ and Wikipedia is based on secondary source material only. The media need to mention the Centre specifically, not only its members, and entries are considered validate only if they describe WAM’s work extensively. These rules are not applied consistently throughout Wikipedia. For example, we have looked at other pages made for research centres (The Newman Centres for example) and noticed that they have not been deleted despite the lack of 3rd party referencing. The references we have chosen have been accused of being “blogspotty” and “tabloid”, generated by WAM researchers or about WAM members with not enough mention of the organization itself.

WAM’s notability is in question because it is an organization that is actively challenging the representations of older women in the media, rather than being an organization that has sought media attention.

We have attempted to restore our entry on WAM by challenging its critics and by referencing the WAM Manifesto, as well as the interventions of members of WAM into various policy realms, one of the demands in the Manifesto itself. If WAM’s entry is deleted, ironically, Wikipedia would be reproducing existing power relations by making research on women and ageing invisible, echoing the relative invisibility of these issues in mainstream media. This is ironic as WAM’s potential deletion is an indicator of the problem of getting women, and the organizations that they found, into the media.

We have also addressed the criticisms by attempting to include the kind of references they requested. The policy is not totally without merit. However, in our current system of under-representation of women in so many of our institutions this heightened state of scrutiny of feminist organizations is troubling. Since mainstream media are not very interested in extensive pieces on smaller research centres, or feminist organizations, we need more strategies to foster inclusion. We are hoping that the addition of the contribution of WAM members to governmental reports in the UK, including to the House of Lords, will help make the case of WAM’s notability.

You can follow our discussion on the proposed deletion talk page and contribute your own arguments if you would like to help us. Consensus on the notability of WAM is important to the outcome of this proposed deletion. Link to the proposed deletion talk page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Centre_for_Women,_Ageing_and_Media_(2nd_nomination)

We also encourage all of you to mention the organizations that you support in your articles and papers, in your interviews with the media, and in your public policy statements. Otherwise we will continue to live in a cyber-universe that perpetuates a very limited range of imaginative possibilities for women and girls.

Silver Gaming Intergenerational Summer School

The ACT Silver Gaming Intergenerational Summer School (SGISS), organized by Margarida Romero, will be held from August 21-22 2015 at the Université Laval in Québec City, Québec. SGISS will bring together students, elders and scholars in activities that aim to explore intergenerational digital creation activities as well as to exchange on the conception, the development and the uses of digital games in social sciences. For more information on the school, and opportunities for funding, please consult the call for applications.

RECAA receives Concordia University’s Engaged Scholar Award!

Screen Shot 2014-12-10 at 10.04.32 AMRespecting Elders: Communities Against Abuse (RECAA) has received the Engaged Scholar Award attributed to a community partner by the University of Concordia’s Office of Community Engagement. RECAA will be recognized for their collaborative work in advancing scholarship through their work with ACT on April 9 during a ceremony held at the Loyola Campus of Concordia University. The award comes along with a $1,000 prize that will go towards continuing work done by RECAA in addressing issues of elder abuse. For more information about RECAA, please consult their website.